Subscribe
Follow GP Racing on

Latest Issue

Subscription offer

Subscribe to the world's best grand prix magazine

Plus

  • Subscribe today and get 3 issues for £3
  • Print + Digital bundle includes Autosport Plus, Autosport.com's premium content
  • Never miss an issue
Subscribe to GP Racing today
Subscribe now

As pointless brouhahas go, the veritable storm-in-an-eggcup over the extent to which expletives should form part of the F1 race broadcast was remarkable for several reasons. The way it hogged the headlines over and above the excitement of the championship run-in was most peculiar – although, since what it actually represented was the rumble of old fault lines grinding against one another, perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised.

As Alex Kalinauckas points out on p106, this is fundamentally yet another example of the FIA and its president making a valid point but the wider world, and particularly F1’s competitors, contriving to miss that point because it wasn’t communicated clearly enough. The fact that a perfectly reasonable observation about sub-optimal communication was communicated so sub-optimally is an irony even Alanis Morrisette (the singer who, famously, dedicated an entire single to adumbrating a
number of supposedly ironic scenarios which
were actually just bad luck or the result of poor cutlery procurement practices) would grasp.

Words have power. That’s why Winston Churchill’s “we will fight them on the beaches” had a powerful rallying effect at the time and continues to resonate through history. Had he merely stood up, shuffled his papers, then mumbled “Eh, sorry, I’ve got my notes mixed up. Spiff spaff. Anybody been to Peppa Pig World?” the result might have been altogether different. See also Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address – not even scheduled to be the headline oration of the day and just 10 finely crafted sentences long, it has remained fixed within the fabric of history. Edward Everett’s two-hour bum-number, which preceded it, has not.

So, given the potency of words, we should be mindful of how we deploy – or, indeed, report them. Mohammed Ben Sulayem was voicing a reasonable point when he highlighted that widespread broadcast of expletives – albeit bleeped out – normalises a particular mode of expression, especially when the people doing it are influential role models. Had he phrased this better, and not freighted it with a needless comment about rap music which became a sideshow in itself, the point might have landed without exploding. After all, in saying that there’s too much swearing on TV these days Mr President is by no means alone.

Whether or not English is their first language, a racing driver in high-pressure situations is likely to express themselves pithily. The commercial rights holder’s desire to maximise drama ensures such soundbites will be picked for broadcast ahead of a discussion on going up a notch on the front wing. In GP Racing we accurately report what people say – but our choice is based on relevance to the matter rather than cheaply dialling up the shock and awe.

Inside the issue

This month's features include

Leclerc vs Hamilton
Who will come out on top next season when Ferrari’s driver dream team hits the track?

Championship showdown
How Oscar Piastri could be the key to F1’s 2024 title race

In conversation with…
Argentina’s first F1 driver since 2001, Williams’s Franco Colapinto

Upgrade hell
Why have some teams struggled badly with upgrades this season?

10 things I love
With RB’s Laurent Meikes

Paddy Lowe
On an F1 career working at Williams, McLaren and Mercedes

Now that was a car
BRM’s last winner, the P160

Showcase
A look back at the F1 career of the departing Daniel Ricciardo

Subscribe to the world's best grand prix magazine


Print & digital bundle

  • All the benefits of a print subscription
  • Enjoy digital access on any device
  • Access Autosport.com’s premium content, Autosport Plus